New member with a somewhat strange question
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 10:20 pm
Hi,
My question, in case you don't want to wade through my introduction, is, after reading this and other forums it seems like a majority of people dealing with incontinence either end up in diapers/sheath catheters, or end up having to use catheters because of retention. A lot of my readings also seem to show a huge swing in percentages for success of treatment. Some sites and health boards claim that it can be cured for sure, but when i look at forums of people who actual suffer, the optimism seems to sink. 10%-40% improvement with drugs, up to 50% improvement with behavior therapy, training, and surgery. Is it really that bleak? Is there really only a 50% chance of getting better? Or, is there a LOT of people who have had the medicine, it worked, and then never posted anywhere. I ask because the vast majority of reading I have done seem to show limited results with kegels, medicine, and surgery and an eventual acceptance of incontinence for the majority of sufferers...
by way of introduction I am a man in his early thirties. I have had what I believe is OAB for as long as I can remember, which over the course of several years progressed. When I started work as clergy I started to wear protection for convenience because I could not get up every fifteen to twenty minutes to go to the restroom. I also served for a time as a driver to my bishops and could obviously not stop when I wanted to use the restroom, so I quietly endured. Now, whenever I am not protected I feel chained to the restroom. I have tried kegels but maybe I am not doing them correctly or I just did not give it enough time. I also tried timed voiding and double voiding, but my work schedule is not such that I can easily follow a schedule like that.
I never told my doctor about it until recently. This was at the behest of my wife, who I told about my issues before I got married and admitted I had not been formally diagnosed. When I went to my annual physical (it was a new doctor because I had recently been transferred) I put my OAB on my medical sheet and all he did was ask me some questions. How long I had been dealing with it, and if I wanted to pursue different treatments. I have naturally dry eyes and migraine headaches so I told him I was worried about the side affects of medication. He agreed with me and said he also had heard a lot of the medicines also cause dizziness. That scared me enough to say I did not want to do medicine. I also have read some horror stories of surgeries and the idea of going "under the knife" except for life threatening need is something I want to avoid, especially if the results are not a guaranteed 100%.
He seemed upset and sympathetic that I have to wear a "pad" as he called it, but he did not suggest anything more. He did not refer me to a urologist or ask for me to come back to do some tests. I mentioned I had had a polynidal cyst three years prior and that doctor checked my prostate (It was agonizing pain and I was terrified I might have cancer), but it seemed odd that my doctor did not want to look further. Given I have dealt with this for over a decade, it really has not negatively impacted my life. I have a supportive wife and I am active. Is that normal for a doctor to leave it at that? Should I be concerned?
Thus my question up at the top. Am I wrong to not ask for more options or is it really as bleak as it looks? Given the medical costs of visits, and pills, and still having to purchase protection, a part of me thinks it would be easier to just live with it if that is the ultimate outcome that most people find.
Thank you so much for your listening to me rant, and I hope that my question of finding a cure is not out of line or insensitive.
Tarlton R
My question, in case you don't want to wade through my introduction, is, after reading this and other forums it seems like a majority of people dealing with incontinence either end up in diapers/sheath catheters, or end up having to use catheters because of retention. A lot of my readings also seem to show a huge swing in percentages for success of treatment. Some sites and health boards claim that it can be cured for sure, but when i look at forums of people who actual suffer, the optimism seems to sink. 10%-40% improvement with drugs, up to 50% improvement with behavior therapy, training, and surgery. Is it really that bleak? Is there really only a 50% chance of getting better? Or, is there a LOT of people who have had the medicine, it worked, and then never posted anywhere. I ask because the vast majority of reading I have done seem to show limited results with kegels, medicine, and surgery and an eventual acceptance of incontinence for the majority of sufferers...
by way of introduction I am a man in his early thirties. I have had what I believe is OAB for as long as I can remember, which over the course of several years progressed. When I started work as clergy I started to wear protection for convenience because I could not get up every fifteen to twenty minutes to go to the restroom. I also served for a time as a driver to my bishops and could obviously not stop when I wanted to use the restroom, so I quietly endured. Now, whenever I am not protected I feel chained to the restroom. I have tried kegels but maybe I am not doing them correctly or I just did not give it enough time. I also tried timed voiding and double voiding, but my work schedule is not such that I can easily follow a schedule like that.
I never told my doctor about it until recently. This was at the behest of my wife, who I told about my issues before I got married and admitted I had not been formally diagnosed. When I went to my annual physical (it was a new doctor because I had recently been transferred) I put my OAB on my medical sheet and all he did was ask me some questions. How long I had been dealing with it, and if I wanted to pursue different treatments. I have naturally dry eyes and migraine headaches so I told him I was worried about the side affects of medication. He agreed with me and said he also had heard a lot of the medicines also cause dizziness. That scared me enough to say I did not want to do medicine. I also have read some horror stories of surgeries and the idea of going "under the knife" except for life threatening need is something I want to avoid, especially if the results are not a guaranteed 100%.
He seemed upset and sympathetic that I have to wear a "pad" as he called it, but he did not suggest anything more. He did not refer me to a urologist or ask for me to come back to do some tests. I mentioned I had had a polynidal cyst three years prior and that doctor checked my prostate (It was agonizing pain and I was terrified I might have cancer), but it seemed odd that my doctor did not want to look further. Given I have dealt with this for over a decade, it really has not negatively impacted my life. I have a supportive wife and I am active. Is that normal for a doctor to leave it at that? Should I be concerned?
Thus my question up at the top. Am I wrong to not ask for more options or is it really as bleak as it looks? Given the medical costs of visits, and pills, and still having to purchase protection, a part of me thinks it would be easier to just live with it if that is the ultimate outcome that most people find.
Thank you so much for your listening to me rant, and I hope that my question of finding a cure is not out of line or insensitive.
Tarlton R